TWITTER IS IMPLEMENTING A NEW POLICY TO FLAG TWEETS FROM POLITICAL FIGURES THAT THEY SAY VIOLATE THE CODE OF CONDUCT


Transcript:

>> TWITTER IS IMPLEMENTING A NEW POLICY TO FLAG TWEETS FROM POLITICAL FIGURES THAT THEY SAY VIOLATE THE CODE OF CONDUCT, THIS COMES AFTER PRESIDENT TRUMP TOLD US THIS WEEK THAT THE SOCIAL MEDIA SITE IS BIASED AGAINST CONSERVATIVES.
>> “TOTALLY BIASED FOR DEMOCRATS, IF I ANNOUNCE TOMORROW THAT I'LL BECOME A NICE LIBERAL DEMOCRAT I WOULD PICK UP FIVE TIMES MORE FOLLOWERS. I WAS PICKING UP 100,000 FOLLOWERS EVERY FEW DAYS. AND ALL OF A SUDDEN, I AM MUCH HARDER NOW”
 -- >> HE SAYS IT'S ALL DEMOCRATS. IS THE PRESIDENT RIGHT? WILL THIS BE A POLICY THAT UNFAIRLY TARGETS HIM AND OTHER REPUBLICANS WHEN IT COMES TO THE COURT UPON DUCT AND VIOLATING THE PLATFORM RULES ON TROLLING AND BULLYING?
>> NO IT WILL NOT UNFAIRLY TARGET HIM AND REPUBLICANS, THAT IS UTTER NONSENSE, BY THE WAY, TWITTER LOVES DONALD TRUMP, DONALD TRUMP HAS BEEN VERY, VERY GOOD TO TWITTER. WILL IT TARGET HIM, YES. WHEN HE BREAKS THE RULES, IF THE SHOE FITS AND HE'S A BULLY IN A TROLL WHICH HE FREQUENTLY IS THEN HE'LL BE PUNISHED. BUT IT IS NOT IDEOLOGICAL.
>> LET ME TEST THIS WITH YOU, I WAS ASSES EARLIER, YOU THINK IF HE CALLS SOMEBODY A LOSER WILL THAT BE BLOCKED? >> I DON'T KNOW THE RULES, I WISH I DID. IS THAT BULLYING? >> I THINK THEY HAVE CLEARLY DEFINED ROLES AND I DON'T KNOW IF THAT QUALIFIES BUT I'M SURE HE BREAKS THEM CONSTANTLY. >> I THINK ADAM STARTED OUT WITH THE NO IN A YES AND JUST TO BE CONTRARY, AMERIGO WITH YES, I DON'T KNOW WHEN I'M ANSWERING YES OR NO TO. >> WILL IMPACT THEM NEGATIVELY, JOIN THE 12 TRILLION OTHER PEOPLE ON TWITTER AND WHAT TWITTER HAS EVOLVED TWO. THIS IS ANOTHER NAIL IN THE COFFIN FOR THIS ONCE GREAT SITE. NOW IT IS EVOLVED TO NOTHING MORE THAN A TOWER OF BABEL IN THE NEW RESTRICTIONS WILL MAKE IT LESS AND LESS RELEVANT. I GET I BET I BUT EVERYBODY USED TO CHECK TWITTER TEN TIMES MORE PER DAY THAN THEY DO NOW.
>> IS IT IDEOLOGICAL?,. >> I THINK IT IS. >> NO WAY. >> YOU'RE ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION. >> IT'S DEVOLVING,
THIS IS BENEFICIAL TO THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE THE MEDIA IS GANGING UP ON HIM AND RESTRICTING HIS SPEECH WHICH WILL ONLY MAKE PEOPLE TAKE ASIDE, EVEN NEUTRAL PEOPLE ON THE MIDDLE. I THINK TWITTER IS GETTING IN HOT WATER, IF I DID THIS QUICKLY, IF I WANT TO TWEET OUT THAT ADAM IS A LOSER TO BUY A HUNDRED ARMY THEN I CAN BLOCK, BUT IF YOU'RE SOMEBODY THAT HAS A LOT OF FOLLOWERS, AND INFLUENCE THEN YOU CAN SAY WHATEVER YOU WANT IN A GET TO DISCLOSURE BECAUSE IT'S IMPORTANT FOR THE WORLD TO KNOW WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY BECAUSE YOU'RE AN IMPORTANT PERSON BUT WHAT I HAVE TO SAY GETS TOTALLY CENTERED. THIS IS GOING IN A WEIRD DIRECTION AND I KNOW WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO AND I THINK THEY MADE A MISTAKE AND WILL BENEFIT THE PRESIDENT AND IT MIGHT RUIN THE WHOLE TWITTER DEVOLUTION IF THAT'S EVEN A WORD. >> THIS IS A WAY TO CENSOR THE PRESIDENT AND LABEL HIM. IF HE HAS NUMEROUS TWEETS WITH ALL THESE WARNING LABELS TO A PERSON THAT IS IN THE MIDDLE OR THE LEFT OR THE RIGHT, THEY WILL SAY THEY'RE SAYING A LOT OF NEGATIVE THINGS. IT IS A WAY TO BRAND THE PRESIDENT NEGATIVELY FROM THEIR ADVANTAGE POINT. THAT'S UNFORTUNATE, WHO IS TO SAY IT'LL STOP THERE? IT COULD ACTUALLY GO TO THOSE OF THOSE OF CERTAIN RELIGIOUS POLICE.

Comments